Document No. 50 and as I have not thorough memoranda to show who actually did so, I would rather not make any remark as to the mistake except to point out that the person who extracted the figures for this table has added together the two items appearing in the Government Gazette of March 3/4, 1866, under the headings of "Special Receipts" and "Ordinance No. 12 of 1867.
I have to refer to (54) at L. Dennys.
Dr. E. J. Eitel to Acting Colonial Secretary,
In S. & N. 5/3.
Sir,
C.O. 5900 READ TO AP 293 Colonial Hong Kong, 22nd February,
I have the honour to reply to your letter No. 210 of 25th ultimo, enclosing extracts from two despatches of the Secretary of State and requesting me to give explanation of the extraordinary mistake discovered in a statement of Receipts for 1865 given in Appendix No. 309 of the Report of the Contagious Diseases Committee.
To the Honourable F. Stewart, Acting Colonial Secretary.
{
| உ
document no 50 and as I have.
n
orough
memoranda to shew who actuain did
actual
so I would rather not make any
remark
as to the misheke except to point out
that the person who extracted the figures
for this table has added together the
in the fore
te fovernment
two items appearing Jazette of March 3/4 1866 under
the
headings of "Special Receipts" and _ "Erdinance Ne 12 of 1887.
I have to.
(54) at L. Dennys.
Dr. E. I Eitel to
-
Acting
In S. & N. 5/3.
Sir.
J
C 0. 5900
READ TO AP 293
Colonia?
HongKong
22nd February,
I have the honour to reply
to
your
letter No 210 of 25th ultim
enclosing extracts from tivo
despatches of the Secretary of State
and requesting me
me to give
explanation of
the ent
arv
extraordinary
mistake discovered; in a
of Receipts for 1865
-given si
309 of
the
appendix
Report of
the Contagionsdinases
Corriers
Honourable
F. Stewart La
Colonial Secretary
Acting
to
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.